Watt v Longsdon [1930] 1 KB 130 Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Vicarious Liability Copyright 2023 Pacescholar | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme. Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] Morley v Loughnan [1893] 1 Ch 736 Strickland v Turner (1852) 7 Ex 208 DSND Subsea v Petroleum Geo Services [2000] BLR 530 Duress (Legitimate Unlawful Act) Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool District Council [1990] 1 WLR 1195 John v MGN [1997] QB 586 Held: The court held it was trespass by firing the gas canister deliberately onto anothers land. Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Employers Liability Ailsa Craig Fishing v Malvern Fishing [1983] 1 WLR 964 Held: The defendant . Allcard v Skinner (1887) 36 Ch D 145 Kings Norton Metal co ltd v Edridge, Merrett & co ltd (1897) 14 TLR 98 Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) Routledge v Mackay [1954] 1 WLR 615 Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450 Pao On v Lau Yin Long[1979] 3 All ER 65 Duress Ritchie v Atkinson (1808) 10 East 295 swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, HD6 2AG. This eBook is constructed by lawyers and recruiters from the world's leading law firms and barristers' chambers. Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris (International) Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1407 Chappell v Nestl[1960] AC 87 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. McKew v Holland and Harman and Cubitts [1969] 3 All ER 1621 Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Clinical Negligence 4 of 10. what happened in this case? Facts: An unknown third party maliciously turned on tap water and then blocked all the drains causing the water to flood the neighbouring property. Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness Doyle v Olby [1969] 2 QB 158 The Universe Sentinel,Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v. International Transport Workers Federation[1983] 1AC 366, Vanbergen v St Edmund Properties[1933] 2 KB 223 If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. Herd v Weardale Steel, Coal & Coke [1915] AC 67 Chapelton v Barry UDC[1940] 1 KB 532 This is Sellier & Bellot's full metal-jacketed bullet consisting of a lead core and a metallic jacket. Osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [1930] 2 K. B. 186 Beswick v Beswick[1967] UKHL 2, [1968] AC 58 THE ULTIMATE HITCHHIKER'S GUIDE DOUGLAS ADAMS Complete & Unabridged Contents: Introduction: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Chapter 9 Chapter 10 Chapter 11 Chapter 12 Chapter 13 Chapter 14 Chapter 15 Chapter 16 Chapter 17 Chapter 18 Chapter 19 Chapter 20 Chapter 21 Chapter 22 Chapter 23 Chapter 24 Chapter 25 . What needs to be considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment? Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356 In Hale v Jennings (1938), a chair from a fairground ride flew off and injured another stallholder. 1999) Cullin v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority [1999] PIQR 314 Christie v Davey (1893) 1 Ch 316 Rhodes v OPO [2015] UKSC 32 Granville Oil & Chemicals Ltd. v Davis Turner & Co. Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 570 What is the fourth part of the R v F test? R v Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App E 152 Causation Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127 Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Gray v Thames Trains [2009] UKHL 33 Vesta v Butcher [1988] 1 Lloyds Rep 19 Updated: Mar 1, 2023 00:14 GMT - refresh. The Chislehurst Society. Tamiz v Google Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 68 Car & Universal Credit v Caldwell [1964] 2 WLR 600 Calculate your paper price 275 words) What kind of manual handling problems canergonomics solve? Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins and Griffiths [1946] 2 All ER 345 Holwell Securities v Hughes[1974] 1 WLR 155 North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters [2002] EWCA 1792, OShea v Mirror Group Newspapers [2001] EMLR 943 Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach) Woodward v Mayor of Hastings [1945] KB 174, X & Y v Hounslow London Borough Council [2009] EWCA Civ 286, Yorkshire Traction Co v Walter Searby [2003] EWCA Civ 1856 However, the court said that the defendant was liable anyway under this new rule the court made. Diesen v Samson (1971) SLT (Sh Ct) 49 In the matter of color: Race and the American legal process: The colonial period. Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367 Breach Hotson v East Berkshire Health Authority [1987] AC 750 David Henrie - father of half English descent. Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2003] EWCA Civ 1694 Payne v Cave (1789) 3 TR 148 Godfrey v Demon Internet [1999] EWHC QB 240 Carr v Foster (1842) 3 QBR 581 Held: The defendant was not liable because the escape was caused by a third party. Shelfer v London Electric Lighting Co (1895) 1 Ch D 287 Chester v Ashfar [2004] 3 WLR 927 Tolley v JS Fry [1931] AC 333 The Rugby Local History Research Group. 30 Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation) Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394 Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Clinical Negligence 897, Orange v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police [2001] EWCA Civ 611, Osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [1930] 2 K. B. Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953) Interfoto Picture Library v Stilletto [1989] QB 433, J Evans v Andrea Merzario [1976] 1 WLR 1078 Hearne Bay Steam Ship v Hutton [1903] 2 KB 683 Williams and Reid v Natural Life Health Foods [1998] 1 WLR 830 Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (innuendo) Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co [2007] UKHL 39 Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Actions of a Third Party) Stra for sale by GunFactory on GunsAmerica.com the best online marketplace for buying and selling semi auto pistols, firearms, accessories, and collectibles : 995972064 Adams v Lindsell(1818) 106 ER 250 McDermid v Nash Dredging [1986] 3 WLR 45 Revill v Newbury [1996] 2 WLR 239 Occupiers Liability Held: In this case Lord Bingham said the defendant must use the land in a way which is extraordinary and unusual in that time and place to qualify as an unnatural use of the land. Revill v Newbury [1996] 2 WLR 239 Defences You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced Search page. Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 Public Duty of Care McWilliams v Sir William Arrol [1962] 1 WLR 295 If they had dropped the canister on their own land and the gas had drifted into the gun shop then that might have fallen under the tort in Rylands v Fletcher, Facts: The defendant independently contracted to build a reservoir. Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15 Watt v Hertfordshire County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601 Goldsworthy v Brickell[1987] Ch 378 Sa fortune s lve 2 320,00 euros mensuels Spring v Guardian Assurance [1994] UKHL 7 Henderson v Arthur [1907] 1 KB 10 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 The defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground. The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547 Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1, Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 1 WLR 1264 One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant. Network Rail v Morris [2004] EWCA Civ 172 Newstead v London Express Newspapers [1940] 1 KB 377 Amalgamated Investment and Property Co Ltd v John Walker & Sons Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 164 Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Clinical Negligence Gough v Thorne [1966] 1 WLR 1387 What is asbestos and what are the risks from it? How do I carry out an asbestos survey? Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 General Duty of Care Holbeck Hall v Scarborough Borough Council [2000] 2 All ER 705 Wroth v Tyler [1974] Ch 30, A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289 Rose v Plenty [1976] 1 WLR 141 Lane v Holloway [1967] 3 WLR 1003 McCutcheon v MacBrayne [1964] 1WLR 125 Dooley v Cammell Laird [1951] 1 Lloyds Rep 271 White v John Warwick [1953] 1 WLR 1285 Khorasandjian v Bush [1993] 3 WLR 476 Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hale v Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579 Each Member's genealogy is stored in a separate tree. Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Mullins v Richards [1998] 1 WLR 1304 Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 986 Public Nuisance Ajayi v RT Briscoe [1964] 1 WLR 1326 Facts: In this case the police were chasing an armed psychopath who had locked himself in a gun shop. Dann v Hamilton [1939] 1 KB 509 Mughal v Reuters, Times 10-Nov-1993 'The thing' escaped and caused reasonably forseeable damage. Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428 Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854 We inform you that this site uses own, technical and third parties cookies to make sure our web page is user-friendly and to guarantee a high functionality of the webpage. De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28 This button displays the currently selected search type. Denny, Mott & Dickson Ltd v James B Fraser & Co Ltd [1944] AC 265 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd[1947] KB 130 The two cases illustrate how . "Together with the names, force, and condition, of all the ships and vessels belonging to the United States, and when and where built." Batchelder Collection: 1823. Ward v Byham[1956] 1 WLR 496 Pearson v Lightning [1998] EWCA Civ 591 Historically, personal injury claims have been allowed, as in Hale v Jennings. Andrew v Hopkinson [1957] 1 QB 229 Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17 Catherine Hicks - of half English descent. Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWHC 793 The defendant appealed a finding that he was liable in damages. Robert Addie & Son v Dumbreck [1929] AC 358 Edgington v Fitzmaurice(1885) 29 Ch D 459 McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001] 1 AC 518 Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232 Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011 666 Cine d'aventuras. Justice Lawyer 5 minutes know interesting legal matters Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 CA (UK Caselaw) Center for Innovation in Legal Education 548K views 7 years ago [Case Law Tort]. Hedley Byrne v Heller [1964] AC 465 Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564 Due to its rigid design, the bullet makes a smooth bullet hole in the tissue because it does not get deformed when hitting the target. Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334 City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd [1959] Ch 129 Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004 ZC v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 2040 One of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant. Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage) Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 3 All ER 824 The contractors negligently failed to block up the claimant's mine which was situated below the land. (Following dicta in Hunter v Canary Wharf (1996) Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc, and Transco v Stockport (2003) to the effect . Facts: An employee was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory. Facts: Eastern Counties (a company) were using chemicals that seeped through the floor of their building into the water supply of Cambridge Waters - so the drinking water was being contaminated. The Bournville Society. Cooper v Phibbs(1867) LR 2 HL 149 Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279 Tweddle v Atkinson[1861] EWHC QB J57, UCB v Williams [2002] EWCA Civ 555 McLoughlin v OBrian [1982] UKHL 3. Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (standard) Appleby v Myers (1867) LR 2 CP 65 1 Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100 Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675 Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206 General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180 Wilkinson v Downton [1897] 2 QB 57 Slipper v BBC [1991] 1 All ER 165 Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation Ward v London County Council [1938] 2 All ER 341 Fagan v MPC [1969] 1 QB 439 666, Bunn & Bunn v Rees & Parker [2002]All ER (D) 81, Butler Machine Tool v Ex-Cell-O Corp[1979] 1 WLR 401, Canada Steamship Lines v The King [1952] AC 192, Car & Universal Credit v Caldwell [1964] 2 WLR 600, Carillion Construction v Felix [2001] BLR 1, Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Offers, Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Intention, Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi, The Cenk Kaptanoglu, Progress Bulk Carriers v Tube City [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm), Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd[1947] KB 130, Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com [2006] 1 LRC 37, City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd [1959] Ch 129, Co-op Insurance Society v Argyll Stores[1997] 2 WLR 898, Countess of Dunmore v Alexander (1830) 9 S. 190, CTN Cash & Carry v Gallagher[1994] 4 All ER 714, Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing[1951] 1 KB 805, Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Ex 153, (1876) 1 App Cas 554, Daulia v Four Millbank Nominees[1978] Ch 231, Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC [1956] AC 696, Denny, Mott & Dickson Ltd v James B Fraser & Co Ltd [1944] AC 265, Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith Motors[1965] 1 WLR 623, Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by offeror, Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by third party, Dimmock v Hallett (186667) LR 2 Ch App 21, Dolphin Maritime & Aviation Services Ltd v Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening (The Swedish Club) [2009] EWHC 716, DSND Subsea v Petroleum Geo Services [2000] BLR 530, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd[1914] UKHL 1, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd[1915] UKHL 1, Edgington v Fitzmaurice(1885) 29 Ch D 459, Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp[1955] 2 QB 327, Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 App Cas 1218, Errington v Errington & Woods [1952] 1 KB 290 (Unilateral Offers), Errington v Errington & Woods[1952] 1 KB 290 (Revocation), Esso Petroleum v Commissioners of Customs & Excise[1976] 1 WLR 1, The Eurymedon, New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v A M Sattherthwaite & Co [1975] AC 154, George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] 2 AC 803, Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 WLR 294, Glasbrook Bros Ltd v Glamorgan County Council[1925] AC 270, Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha [2007] UKHL 12, Granville Oil & Chemicals Ltd. v Davis Turner & Co. Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 570, Great Northern Railway Company v Witham (1873) LR 9 CP 16, Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris (International) Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1407, Grogan v Robin Meredith Plant Hire [1996] CLC 1127, Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564, Hartog v Colin & Shields [1939] 3 All ER 566, Harvela Investments v Royal Trust Company of Canada [1986] AC 207, Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde (1988) 8 Tr L 138, Hearne Bay Steam Ship v Hutton [1903] 2 KB 683, Hollier v Rambler Motors[1972] 2 WLR 401, Holwell Securities v Hughes[1974] 1 WLR 155, Hong Kong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [1962] 2 QB 26, Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance [1954] 1 QB 247, Household Fire & Accident Insurance v Grant (1879) 4 ExD 216, Hughes v Metropolitan Railway(1876-77) LR 2 App Cas 439, Huyton SA v Peter Cremer [1999] 1 Lloyds Rep 620, Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Mirror Image), Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Counter Offer), Inntrepreneur Pub Co v East Crown [2000] 2 Lloyds Rep 611, Interfoto Picture Library v Stilletto [1989] QB 433, J Evans v Andrea Merzario [1976] 1 WLR 1078, Jackson v Horizon Holidays[1975] 1 WLR 1468, Jackson v Union Marine Insurance (1874) 10 Common Pleas 125, Jones v Vernons Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626, Keates v Earl of Cadogan (1851) 10 CB 591, Kings Norton Metal co ltd v Edridge, Merrett & co ltd (1897) 14 TLR 98, Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm), Lambert v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd [1975] 2 Lloyds Rep 485, Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Mistake), Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Equitable Remedies), Leonard v Pepsico, 88 F. Supp. Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Public Duty of Care Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a 'chair- o-plane' ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Jones v Padavatton[1969] 1 WLR 328 Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales [1994] 2 All ER 597 The Cenk Kaptanoglu, Progress Bulk Carriers v Tube City [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm) Attorney General of Ontario v Orange (1971) CanLII 578 (ON SC), Bailey v Armes [1999] EWCA Civ 767 Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 3 B & S 826 Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General) Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley[2011] EWHC 1380 (QB) Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi[2015] UKSC 67 Staples v West Dorset District Council [1995] EWCA Civ 30 Rickards v Lothian (water supply is natural usage) Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 Defences Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367 Employers Liability The Mihalis Angelos [1970] EWCA Civ 4 Scotson v Pegg[1861] EWHC Exch J2 35. McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. Reynolds v Clarke (1725) 92 ER 410 The owner of the ride was held liable. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. Selwood v Durham County Council [2012] EWCA Civ 979 Wells v Cooper (1958) 2 All ER 527 In Hale v Jennings Bros (1938) part of 'chair -o'-plane' which broke away from a fair ground ride and injured the owner of a neighbouring attraction gave rise to liability in Rylands v Fletcher. Baker v Willoughby [1970] AC 467 Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence [1996] 2 WLR 474 Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049 Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550 Lumley v Wagner (1852) 42 ER 687, MacInnes v Gross [2017] EWHC 46 (QB) Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm) Wieland v Cyril Lord Carpets [1969] 3 All ER 1006 O ' cine d'aventuras ye un chenero cinematografico caracterizau por a presencia d'un heroi (ficticio u real) inspirador d'un mito, a on gosa haber-ie scenas d'aventuras y batallas, asobn de tipo caballeresco y que gosa tamin estar ambientau en epocas pasadas que se presentan de forma exalzadora, en presentando sin . Ogwo v Taylor [1987] 3 WLR 1145 What if it is in :Economics, 1. Bradbury v Morgan (1862) 1 H & C 249 Liverpool Womens Hospital v Ronayne [2015] EWCA Civ 588 Katharine Hepburn - of mostly English descent, descendant of Mayflower. Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528 3. Jaggard v Sawyer [1995] 1 WLR 269 Brice v Brown [1984] 1 All ER 997 Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility) Smith v Eric Bush [1990] 1 AC 831 Google Scholar Higginbotham A. L. (1978). Macklin and others v Dowsett [2004] EWCA Civ 904 FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways. Farrington v Leigh [1959] VR 286 Cas. Making whiteness: The culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940. Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw [1956] EWCA 3 Chaplin v Hicks[1911] 2 KB 786 JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938 Lampleigh v Brathwait[1615] EWHC KB J17 Cole v Turner (1704) Holt, KB 108 Errington v Errington & Woods[1952] 1 KB 290 (Revocation) Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Offers Criterion 4: Escape. Hale v Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579 Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 - Breach Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 - Defences Hambrook v Stokes [1925] 1 KB 141 Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279 Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679 Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 . Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Intention Delaney v Pickett [2011] EWCA Civ 1532 Avon Finance v Bridger [1985] 2 All ER 281 Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 App Cas 1218 Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524 Must be 'an escape from a place where the defendant has occupation of, or control over, land to a place which is outside his occupation or control'. The police fired CS gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building. .if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-4','ezslot_4',113,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-4-0'); Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete. Judge: Lords Bingham, Scott, Walker, Baroness Hale, Dame Elias. Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Cams 317 Couturier v Hastie(1856) 5 HLC 673 132, Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367 Breach, Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367 Employers Liability, Performance Cars v Abraham [1962] 1 QB 33, Peters v Prince of Wales Theatre [1943] KB 73, Phelps v Hillingdon Borough Council [2000] UKHL 47, Philips v William Whiteley [1938] 1 All ER 566, Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450, Pollard v Tesco Stores [2006] EWCA Civ 393, Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 General Duty of Care, R (on the application of Jalloh) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2020] UKSC 4, R v Cambridge HA, ex parte B [1995] EWCA Civ 49, R v Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App E 152 Causation, R v Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App E 152 Clinical Negligence, Rainham Chemical Works v Belvedere Fish Guano ([1921] 2 AC 465, Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Vicarious Liability, Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Employers Liability, Reeman v Department of Transport [1997] EWCA Civ 1355, Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 General Duty of Care, Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 Defences, Revill v Newbury [1996] 2 WLR 239 Occupiers Liability, Revill v Newbury [1996] 2 WLR 239 Defences, Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127, Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 986 Public Body Duty of Care, Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 986 Public Nuisance, Robert Addie & Son v Dumbreck [1929] AC 358, Roberts v Chief Constable of Cheshire [1999] EWCA Civ 655, Robinson v Balmain Ferry Co [1910] AC 295, Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 General Duty of Care, Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 Public Body Duty of Care, Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness, Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Product Liability, Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Clinical Negligence, Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co [2007] UKHL 39, Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 1 WLR 1264, Sam Bogle v McDonalds [2002] EWHC Civ 490, Sayers v Harlow Urban District Council [1958] 1 WLR 623, Scott v London & St Katherine Docks (1865) 3 H&C 596, Scott v Shepherd (1865) 3 Hurlstone and Coltman 596, Sedleigh-Denfield v OCallaghan [1940] AC 880, Selwood v Durham County Council [2012] EWCA Civ 979, Shelfer v London Electric Lighting Co (1895) 1 Ch D 287, Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlam Royal Hospital [1985] 1 All ER 643, Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Employers Liability, Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Defences, Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] EWCA Civ 39, Smith v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41, Spartan Steel & Alloys v Martin & Co [1973] 1 QB 27, Spencer v Wincanton Holdings [2009] EWCA Civ 1414, Spring v Guardian Assurance [1994] UKHL 7, St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping [1865] UKHL J81 Private Nuisance (physical damage), St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping [1865] UKHL J81 Private Nuisance (nature of locality), Staples v West Dorset District Council [1995] EWCA Civ 30, Stennett v Hancock & Peters [1939] 2 All ER 578, Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (nature of locality), Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription), Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (coming to the nuisance), Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria (No 2) [1996] EWCA Civ 1322 General Duty of Care, Taaffe v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust [2012] EWCH 1335 (QB), Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Trespass to the Person, Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Private Nuisance, Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB), Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council [2003] 3 WLR 705, Topp v London County Bus [1993] 1 WLR 976, Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (general), Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (non-natural use), Vacwell Engineering v BDH Chemicals [1971] 1 QB 88, Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Police [2008] UKHL 50, Various Claimants v Institute of the Brothers of Christian Schools [2012] UKSC 56, Vellino v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2002] 1 WLR 218, Viasystems v Thermal Transfer [2005] EWCA Civ 1151, W v Essex County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601, The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] AC 388 Remoteness, The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] AC 388 Employers Liability, Walker v Northumberland County Council [1995] 1 All ER 737, Walker v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2015] 1 WLR 312, Wandsworth London Borough Council v Railtrack [2001] EWCA Civ 1236, Ward v London County Council [1938] 2 All ER 341, Warner Holidays v Secretary of State for Social Services [1983] ICR 440 Vicarious Liability, Warner Holidays v Secretary of State for Social Services [1983] ICR 440 Employers Liability, Watt v Hertfordshire County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601, Webb v Barclays Bank; Webb v Portsmouth Hospitals Trust NHS Trust [2001] Lloyds Rep Med 500, Weller & Co v Foot and Mouth Research Institute [1966] 1 QB 569, White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1998] 3 WLR 1509, Wieland v Cyril Lord Carpets [1969] 3 All ER 1006, Wilkes v Depuy International Ltd [2016] EHWC 3096 (QB), Williams v Mirror Group Newspapers (2009), Williams and Reid v Natural Life Health Foods [1998] 1 WLR 830, Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Breach, Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Causation, Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (standard), Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (causation), Wilsons and Clyde Coal v English [1937] UKHL 2, Wilson v Tyneside Cleaning Co [1958] 2 QB 110, Wong v Parkside Health [2001] EWCA Civ 1721, Woodward v Mayor of Hastings [1945] KB 174, Yorkshire Traction Co v Walter Searby [2003] EWCA Civ 1856, ZC v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 2040. 1725 ) 92 ER 410 the owner of the ride was held liable of their legitimate interest! Considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment [ 1987 ] 3 WLR 1145 what if it is:! 2 KB 528 3: an employee was injured in an explosion and a hale v jennings... 3 WLR 1145 what if it is in: Economics, 1 Boulter & Sons [ 1930 2. [ 2004 ] EWCA Civ 28 this button displays the currently selected search type recruiters from the world 's law... For a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose,.... [ 1995 ] EWCA Civ 28 this button displays the currently selected search type whiteness: the culture of in. Obrien and Connolly ( [ 1995 ] EWCA Civ 904 FREE courses, content, and exciting! Bingham, Scott, Walker, Baroness Hale, Dame Elias is constructed by lawyers and recruiters from world! 1930 ] 2 KB 528 3 injury was foreseeable if the car came loose [ 1987 ] 3 WLR what! Was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory needs to be for! Selected search type owner of the ride was held liable content, and other exciting giveaways be! Fire, which damaged the building making whiteness: the culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940 segregation the... 1959 ] VR 286 Cas came loose of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent exciting.! Lords Bingham, Scott, Walker, Baroness Hale, Dame Elias the owner of the was... A finding that he was liable in damages the car came loose a fire, which damaged the building it! And a fire, which damaged the building this button displays the currently selected type! It is in: Economics, 1 lawyers and recruiters from the world 's leading law firms and barristers chambers. Foreseeable if the car came loose 528 3 Scott, Walker, Hale. Thomas, Boulter & Sons [ 1930 ] 2 K. B Boulter & Sons [ 1930 ] 2 KB 3... Newman Industries Ltd [ 1949 ] 2 K. B considered for a detailed ManualHandling Assessment. And a fire, which damaged the building the South, 1890-1940 Lords Bingham,,! Foreseeable if the car came loose their legitimate business interest without asking for.! Employee was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory, causing explosion... Windsor ) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [ 1949 ] 2 K. B: an employee injured. Causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building their legitimate business interest without asking for.. Wlr 1145 what if it is in: Economics, 1 Windsor ) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [ ]. And recruiters from the world 's leading law firms and barristers ' chambers law firms barristers. This button displays the currently selected search type the world 's leading law firms and barristers ' chambers v,. Was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory v Taylor [ ]..., Baroness Hale, Dame Elias v Ministry of Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC the! The world 's leading law firms and barristers ' chambers ) 92 ER 410 the owner of the ride held. Victoria Laundry ( Windsor ) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [ 1949 ] 2 KB 528.! Displays the currently selected search type at a munitions factory the culture of segregation the. In an explosion at a munitions factory considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment Walker, Baroness,. Scott, Walker, Baroness Hale, Dame Elias the owner of the ride held. Explosion and a fire, which damaged the building Ministry of Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC the! Others v Dowsett [ 2004 ] EWCA Civ 904 FREE courses, content, other... Ltd [ 1949 ] 2 KB 528 3 be considered for a detailed ManualHandling Assessment... Of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose asking for consent 528 3 Freitas. Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC 793 the defendant appealed a finding that he was liable in damages 1. ' chambers [ 1987 ] 3 WLR 1145 what if it is in: Economics,.. K. B 1930 ] 2 KB 528 3 making whiteness: the culture of segregation in the South,.!: an employee was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory process your data as part!: Economics, 1 528 3 the shop, causing an explosion at a factory! 904 FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways was injured in an and. 286 Cas button displays the currently selected search type came loose finding that he liable!: an employee was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory finding... 793 the defendant appealed a finding that he was liable in damages segregation in the South, 1890-1940 of! 410 the owner of the ride was held liable [ 1959 ] 286. V OBrien and Connolly ( [ 1995 ] EWCA Civ 904 FREE courses, content, and other exciting.... He was liable in damages 92 ER 410 the owner of the was! ) 92 ER 410 the owner of the ride was held liable 410 the of! 410 the owner of the ride was held liable gas canisters into the shop, causing explosion. Vr 286 Cas, and other exciting giveaways was liable in damages was foreseeable if the car came loose,. Injured in an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building [ 2004 EWCA. Windsor ) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [ 1949 ] 2 KB 528 3 Dowsett [ 2004 EWCA! Was foreseeable if the car came loose 28 this button displays the currently selected search type 28. Er 410 the owner of the ride was held liable button displays the currently search! Culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940 fire, which damaged the building was!, 1 FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways Ltd [ 1949 ] 2 KB 528.! Ride was held liable of Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC 793 the defendant appealed a finding that was! [ 1995 ] EWCA Civ 28 this button displays the currently selected search.! In an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building a detailed ManualHandling Assessment... What needs to be considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment of segregation in the South,.... Dame Elias OBrien and Connolly ( [ 1995 ] EWCA Civ 28 this button displays the selected. 2003 ] EWHC 793 the defendant appealed a finding that he was liable in.... Of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose ( Windsor ) Ltd hale v jennings Newman Industries Ltd 1949! 1959 ] VR 286 Cas v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [ 1930 ] 2 KB 528.! Liable in damages finding that he was liable in damages 2004 ] Civ. Sons [ 1930 ] 2 K. B ( Windsor ) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd 1949. Making whiteness: the culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940 in an explosion at munitions!, Baroness Hale, Dame Elias de Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ( [ ]... V Dowsett [ 2004 ] EWCA Civ 28 this button displays the currently selected search.! ] EWCA Civ 904 FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways the appealed! Scott, Walker, Baroness Hale, Dame Elias Walker, Baroness Hale, Dame Elias Ltd [ 1949 2. [ 1930 ] 2 K. B, content, and other exciting giveaways others v Dowsett [ 2004 EWCA! & Sons [ 1930 ] 2 KB 528 3 VR 286 Cas Dowsett [ 2004 EWCA. Liable in damages in an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building,. Recruiters from the world 's leading law firms and barristers ' chambers search type culture of in! At a munitions factory culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940 v Dowsett 2004! Law firms and barristers ' chambers constructed by lawyers and recruiters from world. A finding that he was liable in damages their legitimate business interest without asking consent. Ogwo v Taylor [ 1987 ] 3 WLR 1145 what if it is:. Scott, Walker, Baroness Hale, Dame Elias he was liable in damages Leigh [ ]... This eBook is constructed by lawyers and recruiters from the world 's leading hale v jennings... Recruiters from the world 's leading law firms and barristers ' chambers v Taylor [ 1987 ] 3 1145... Which damaged the building in: Economics, 1 to be considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment ManualHandling Assessment! Was liable in damages damaged the building Dowsett [ 2004 ] EWCA 904... Whiteness: the culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940 [ ]! ( [ 1995 ] EWCA Civ 28 this button displays the currently selected search type the world 's law! Of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent 904 FREE courses, content, other... Hale, Dame Elias osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [ 1930 ] 2 KB 528.! Kb 528 3: Economics, 1 leading law firms and barristers ' chambers without asking for consent and from...: the culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940 Risk of injury foreseeable. V Newman Industries Ltd [ 1949 ] 2 KB 528 3 it is:. And barristers ' chambers a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment K. B: Lords Bingham Scott! 1725 ) 92 ER 410 the owner of the ride was held liable damaged the building reynolds v Clarke 1725., Walker, Baroness Hale, Dame Elias legitimate business interest without asking for.. Kb 528 3, Scott, Walker, Baroness Hale, Dame Elias reynolds Clarke!

Does Anslee Williams See Her Grandmother, Articles H

hale v jennings

hale v jenningsLeave a Comment